***Preface***I know, I know, this isn't customary at all - but I simply can't help myself. As a newcomer to this Blog I feel as if I should somewhat introduce myself to the readers out there, particularly the ones making a valiant effort to stop and read this post (thanks mom!). As such, I thought to myself: what better way to delve into a first post than to go against the grain? That's why I took it upon myself to shift gears out of the domestic politics that have lately become a staple of this Blog (Okay fine, and Transformers). Instead I have elected to randomly discuss a multinational affair involving Kim Jong-Il, and one that isn't [entirely] humorous!
Enjoy!
***End Preface***Plan of action We have all felt, to some degree, the ramifications of the nuclear tests conducted by North Korea. It is even possible that there may never be a consensus among the public about what has lead us to this. For that matter, there may never be a consensus as to whether or not the test was really part of
a secret operation by the U.S. in some kind of conspiracy!!!!
sigh. What matters now is that we move towards a solution (ideally one that doesn't result in suicide bombers in metropolitan environments)
Responding without escalating the violence Unfortunately, that is task that hasn't come easily for any of our leadership. Nor should it. It is an involved process with multiple variables and carries enormous ramifications for global peace. I, personally would prefer that they take a night to "sleep on it" instead of haphazardly making such a crucial policy verdict. After all, they are handing down a decision that could disastrously change all of human life, as we know it.
The factors involved Quite simply, the basic tenants of international peace are being challenged. Now they must be adapted to the new landscape of nuclear diplomacy, all the while, striving to subdue a potential nuclear altercation. I myself set out to find a reputable response to this complex, important question. I won't lie; it was a tedious project to tackle. Nonetheless, thanks to a little Game Theory, avoidance of groupthink and being, well, my awesome self, I have finally settled on one position.
My PlanFirst and foremost - one element must remain status quo. Denying any bilateral talks with North Korea must be firmly upheld (and I believe it will). The reason this is so essential is that North Korea leaps at every opportunity it has to incite an actual retaliatory statement from the US. Still, we must resist the urge to bomb this country into the stone age.
For further proof, simply watch the outcome following the joint UN panel, which passed the multinational sanctions against North Korea. Afterwards, the North Korean Representative stood up, and as he was walking out, turned to say that "any further retaliation from the
United States would be viewed as a declaration of war." Even an occasion as far stretched as this, they desperately try to insinuate that nobody, other than the United States, caused these sanctions; naturally, the representative overlooked the fact that 5 other countries signed the pact. Nope, the U.S. is accountable for all of it. At least that is North Korea's diseased political stance.
An extremely rare likeness of Kim Jong-Il, where he is not adorned in one his signature, highly fashionable, summer dressesWhat makes it so absurd is that this remarkably unintelligent response came after we had withdrawn from any of North Korea's requested "bilateral talks." We did so, because we knew these same "talks" would probably be misconstrued as an a aggressive move, and exploited by Kim Jong-Il to gain bargaining leverage - so that he can access the new line of Fendi's women's clothing. Returning to seriousness, they have made the transparency of their agenda overwhelming. They are clinging desperately to any possible hope of a legitimate cause for war, for the sole purpose of using violence as a means of negotiation. Let's not give it to them.
With that established it's time to move on to the most important strategic goal we face; we must defend the safety of all nations impacted by this threat. Before you rush to discard the proposal as appeasement or not delivering an adequate punitive action; attempt to understand the rationale behind attempting this approach.
It is an established fact that we face a very realistic possibility for a regional arms race. It has developed so far, that Japan has released internal data regarding the timetable needed for creating a formidable nuclear arsenal. Regardless of the fears, we still face a very realistic opportunity to stop such an arms race. We can even do so, with the added bonus of improving our relationships with all countries involved.
This is how we accomplish these goalsThe solution requires remarkably minimal effort, yet it is a hugely symbolic gesture on our behalf. The U.S. needs to make an official declaration - not to North Korea - but to the regional countries that are within range of a North Korean missile strike. In this declaration we must firmly commit to the defense of these countries from any North Korean aggression. By doing so, also assure them that they fall under the umbrella of our absurdly-destructive-nuclear-weaponry.
Why is this so important? It's quite simple. Unlike the citizenry, the leadership in these affected nations is not particularly eager to incur a bill for a multi-billion dollar defense program. Moreover, even if they were to embark on such a commitment, none would ever build an arsenal rivaling the one we already possess. Under such circumstances they would realize that it would be redundant/wasteful for them to needlessly initiate a plan for arms development.
The pay off Perhaps the greatest feat stemming from this strategy isn't even sanctioning North Korea (for the first time with UN member nations adopting uniform policies, mind you). No, I would contend that the most positive element comes from the strengthening of our relationship with the rest of the world. The tremendous repair that it would do for our international relationships is key factor for our country; it will be necessary if we are to ever gain outside endorsement for our international policies. The multilateral negotiations involve countries that are frequently voicing strong disagreement with the U.S. policy goals. As a result of this redeemed alliance, the possibility of restoring our international legitimacy is truly amazing. If it all still seems too far-fetched, and the bold predictions simply don't pan out in your mind - then I propose the following question to you. Can you imagine how much more effective we would be in our foreign initiatives with endorsements from
China, Japan and India?
To summarize, we can halt a regional arms race. We can restore our weakened relationships with multiple countries. We can "tell" Kim Jong-Il that his country will be liquidated the moment he becomes aggressive, without actually saying anything to him at all! In other words, we will solve a myriad of internal problems, save millions lives abroad and do so at virtually no cost.
Sounds like a plan to me!