Halloween "in the hood"

Wow?!? White people making fun of black culture on a large scale at a predominantly white school that was able to be built because of some of the earliest gentrification in the baltimore area, at a school that houses the top future doctors in america? NAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA, who would've thunk it?


Frat suspended over 'hood' party

Excerpt:
Johns Hopkins University has suspended the Sigma Chi fraternity because of a "Halloween in the Hood" party that drew protests by black students.

The invitation to the party, posted on the Web site Facebook, encouraged guests to wear "regional clothing from our locale" with jewelry including "bling bling ice ice, grills" and "hoochie hoops."

The party, held Saturday night at the fraternity house, featured a skeleton pirate hanging on a noose.


Black Student Union members protested the party on Monday, saying the appearance of the image and the language on the invitation highlighted racial tensions at Hopkins and the strained relations between the university and the surrounding community.

Protesters held signs showing a historical lynching next to a picture of the fraternity's skeleton

"The Shinning"

I love Halloween if you can't tell. But this is from The Simpson's Treehouse of Horros, which they do every year. It's the only time I really look for an episode of The Simpsons any more. If you have never seen the Treehouse of Horrors, like The Simpsons or like Halloween then explore Youtube.com (after watching the video below). This one is consistently ranked as the favorite of all time. From Stephen King's The Shining...

Happy Hallowday

Homestarrunner Halloween Special. It's silly but funny anyway.

2005.
2004.
2003.
Photos of people who dress up like Homestar & Co.

This photo is from 2003. (Homestar is John McEnroe; The King is the Hamburgler; Strong Mad is Magnum PI)

Never done anything worthwhile? Are you a useless human? Not a problem!

You'll have to excuse me, I'm a bit out of it. You see, I just climbed back into my chair after collapsing in sheer disbelief. That's because I have just learned the truly unthinkable. There is actually a more despicable symbol of today's society than Subway's spokeswoman - Jared Fogle. No, I'm not talking about another ambiguously-gendered, binge dieter. In fact, it isn't a person at all. The offender is a piece of jewelry.


"But Robert!" you ask, "What is wrong with jewelry lol?"


This is what's wrong:



Sure, at a glance, this appears to be a gaudy collection of championship rings. And indeed it is. But these are special. These are for FANTASY SPORTS CHAMPIONSHIPS!!!!! Don't believe me? Look for yourself: retarded


"But Robert hehe," you say, "everybody playz fantasy sports lolol." And you're mostly correct. Many people do play fantasy sports. Many people also watch "fantasy movies" and read "fantasy books" too - but any kid who anoints themselves head wizard of dumbledore, after reading Harry Potter, deserves every bit of the wedgie he will inevitably get from the class bully.


We have fallen so far as a society. Everywhere you look, mediocrity is being rewarded - and we think that's okay because Dr. Phil says so. Here's a news flash: It's not okay! And for the record, I don't believe for a second that Dr. Phil has ever had a girlfriend in his entire life (and the ones you have to tip at the end of the night don't count).


Do you really want to be like him? Do you cry with Oprah? Snap out of it and go accomplish something! Sheesh, next thing you know - they are going to start giving out awards in baseball.

"That's Kind Of Gay"

ESPNU announcer Brian Kinchen, probably will not have a job later on today, following his comments in the Northern Illinois-Iowa game.

I, personally, don't think he should be fired, I just think that the reaction from the play-by-play announcer is hilarious. There is about five seconds of just dead silence.

Peyton Manning

is the best quarterback in the history of the NFL.

I don't care what anyone says. Don't give me the "he hasn't won a super bowl" garbage. Don't give me the "Brady has taken his team farther."

He's like the Neo of NFL football. He can see the field (the matrix) in some weird way, it's like the dude has super powers.

Discuss, but if you argue for anyone other than Manning (like Marino or Montana) you're wrong.

But still, nonetheless, discuss.

10 Days until Election Day

Four races in the Senate are up for grabs and 21 in the House, according to Chris at The Fix. Of course anything can happen on election day, but truthfully those are the only ones that are really likely to sway either way. Polls tend to be pretty great predictors of these things. And Chris puts Ohio in the box for the Democrats, which went against my prediction. And Rell apparently is right, I concede.

Senate Races: (GOP 0, Dems 5, 4 Toss up)
Missouri
New Jersey
Tennessee
Virginia

House Races: (GOP 5, Dems 9, 21 Toss up)
Connecticut 2nd, 4th, 5th
Florida 13th, 16th, 22nd
Iowa 1st
Illinois 6th
Indiana 9th
Kentucky 4th
Minn. 6th
NC 11th
New Mexico 1st
New York 24th, 26th
Ohio 15th
Penn. 6th, 7th, 8th



Hello Penn. and Virginia

The last two Senate races that I'm handicaping are in Pennsylvania and Virginia. Some of the polls say that Penn is out of reach. Senator Rick Santorum (R) trails Bob Casey (D) in the polls by about 51-39, which is about as close to packing up your bags and leaving. BUT the undecideds march on with somewhere between 10-12 percent of the vote left to decide. So it could change. But that would mean swinging it all for Sen. Santorum.

Thus, I turn to Virginia where Sen. George Allen faces off against Democratic challenger James Webb. Guess which way the polls sway! Ah, you were wrong. Sen. Allen leads with 47-43 percent of the vote with about 8 percent undecided. Webb has closed the gap since July, when he was 16 down with 20 percent undecided. But he hasn't made much progress in recent weeks. Webb's strength has been in Northern Virginia and Hampton Roads, but everywhere else Sen. Allen jumps ahead. This race is most famous for the macaca comment and Sen. Allen announcing that his mother is Jewish. And now there are sex rumors in a book by Webb.

Predictions: Casey in Penn by 7, and Sen. Allen in Virginia by 6.

Charlie Brown Halloween is good for your soul



It's the full 30 minute version, so it takes time to load.

Halloween is hurtful

We all know that Halloween is a day chosen to dress up as monsters or other imaginary people.... But at what price? In our rush to come up with inventive new costumes, we've become increasingly insensative.

We never stop to think about the sexy female police officers, sexy nurses, schoolgirls and of course the fairies who occupy these roles on a daily basis. It must be difficult and even painful to watch the myriads of people out there pretending to be you on a day of mischief, mayhem and candy corn.

"she's crying on the inside"

So my friends, I ask that you be mindful of these everyday citizens, and find other sexy costumes this Halloween. Please, remember that there are people's feelings at stake.

How can you expect her to uphold freedom, knowing that she's the subject of a sorority girl's costume design?


This post is 100% not serious. Happy (sexy) Halloween Everybody!

Tennessee Senatorial Race Gets Dirtier

We posted the press conference crashing that took part over the weekend between two Senate candidates in Tennessee. But things are really getting fired up with just 13 days to go. Jeff is keeping things up-to-date on the affairs of his home state.

This race is getting nasty and probably because it involves Moderate Democratic candidate Harold Ford, Jr. He's 36, a bachelor and some people don't seem to be liking it.

Charges of Racism and disputing party leaders have arisen
Republicans were bickering among themselves over an advertisement in the particularly nasty campaign in Tennessee that even some Republicans have denounced as racist. The dispute pitted Bob Corker against his own party leadership Tuesday after it rebuffed his call to pull the ad, which lampoons Rep. Harold Ford Jr.’s reputation as a man about town.

The problem: if a candidate truly raised a stink and demanded it, he could totally repudiate the ad and demand it be pulled. In the ad, a young white actress playing the stereotype of a “dumb blonde” talks about meeting Ford, a 36-year-old bachelor who is black, “at the Playboy party.” At the end of the ad, she winks and says to the camera, “Harold — call me.”

The ad brought immediate criticism from the Ford campaign and the NAACP, whose Washington office called it “a powerful innuendo that plays to pre-existing prejudices about African-American men and white women.”

Here's the ad:

Saving Healthcare

Healthcare in the US is one of the most ridiculous things. So many lesser countries have 10 times the health care coverage or access that we have. Almost 50 million Americans are uninsured medically. I'm 26 years old, eat well, exercise often and I have to visit the doctor atleast once or twice a year. How can poorer families pay for it? Everyone knows about premiums and insurance companies, which hospitals and offices are in network, deductibles and co-pays. This article in the New York Times got me thinking about how to make it better for both the rich and the poor.

And since a lot of companies hiring first-time workers don't offer insurance, we should probably care about the state of healthcare at the bare minimum because of cost to ourselves. (there are a lot more reasons to care though)

Here's the point: "Officials decided that for many patients with chronic diseases, it would be cheaper to provide free preventive care than to absorb the high cost of repeated emergencies."

Educated and preventing as little at 620 patients, according to the article, can turn and save close to half a million dollars.

So to cut this short, preventitive treatment is part of the key. And I think someone will eventually figure out that that means following health and exercise guidelines as well. Unlike a lot of problems that we face, this one has a whole bunch of solutions that we know to work.

Why Is Our Culture So Fascinated With Lists?

I mean lists have got to be like one of the top five things to do in the world right now (get the point?).

But Sportscenter has the top 10 everyday. We have TRL, which countdowns the top 10 "music" videos in the country. Radio countdowns everynight from 5 p.m. to 8 p.m. We have the Weekly Top 40 on sundays, we have the billboard hot 100. We have the top 25 in college basketball and football.

Everything is about lists and orders. Why is this? What does it say about us a culture that we are obsessed with placing things in order, some being better or more important than others?

Butch Davis interested in UNC

Thought some of you might be interested, since Carolina is trying to figure out who will be its next football coach. Here's a story from the Charlotte Observer.

"I don't know what direction they're going to go in," he said by telephone, "but I definitely am interested, and I'm interested in getting back into coaching."

Sign him before anyone else gets into the mix.

My girl Natalie in Bazaar


Harvard educated, tons of money, ridiculously perfect looking, great smile, sense of humor and talented. V for Vendetta was her last movie, which I loved even if she did have to shave off her hair for. But she's now had a string of hit movies that range from blockbusters like Star Wars to dramatic love stories (Closer) to independent successes like the hilariously original Garden State. Egotastic is proclaiming her the new Audrey. This just gives me a chance to throw her picture up. And you'll find more goodness if you go over to Egotastic.com.

Halloween is for the (Eye) Candy

Seriously, what is it about Halloween that compels college-age girls to release their inner skank?

I just graduated from Indiana University, which wasn't known for its undergraduate rigor and subsequently has a vast supply of skinny dumb blondes and brunettes. And I noticed this phenomenon last year and the years I was at Carolina. 15-20,000 girls felt the need to wear as little as possible on one night of the year as a release, or as a chance to act out of their conservative nature. A few try to be funny or original but most just skip right to the sexuality. (Notice how I have reserved the typical sexist comment here).

"Looking sexy is now considered normal, feminine behavior for a woman, so on a day like Halloween, women will take it as creative license to wear revealing clothing and no one can call them a tramp that day," said Donna Gough, an assistant professor of women's studies at Cal State Fullerton. "And for men, it's a day where they can openly stare at and drool over women in such attire without being called a chauvinist pig." -- From this story.

Sen. Obama Mulling White House Run (Update: Video)

If he runs, he has my vote. Period. I don't need to go into the reasons. Obama simply = that dude.

Obama says he's mulling a White House run

Excerpt:
Sen. Barack Obama of Illinois said Sunday that he was considering a run for the Democratic presidential nomination in 2008, backing away from previous pledges to serve out his full six-year Senate term.

Obama, 45, told NBC's "Meet the Press" that he would not make any decision before the Nov. 7 midterm election.

"I am still at the point where I have not made a decision to -- to pursue higher office," he said, "but it is true that I have thought about it over the last several months."

Video here: MSNBC's Meet The Press Video.

Tenn. Update: Crashing Press Conferences

Hilarious.

Searching for Jacob

Amazing piece on 60 Minutes Sunday night about Darfur. Check it out and I'll post a video clip if I can find it.

Slow Friday

So there aren't really many stories out there that interested me or that I could find worth sending a whole post on. So I thought of a couple random ones and figured to throw them in for your viewing pleasure.

- Rell and I have this discussion going. Well, it's not a discussion as much as I ask him every week if his prediction for Carolina football has changed. He originally started with 8-4 prediction I believe before the season began, proclaiming a bowl visit. This isn't unusual for him or Jonathan Peele for that matter. It was then amended to 7-5 reluctantly on his part after a 1-5 start. And the Tar Heels are now 1-6. I stand by the claim: Rell is a sports genius as long as it's not about Carolina athletics. But the Tar Heels lost to Virginia (3-5) last night, 23-0. We should all take time out of our day to point out that Rell is wrong.

- Project Runway ended Wednesday night with season 3 as Jeffrey won at Olympus Fashion Week in NYC. The whole world was pulling for Michael Knight, but he just didn't have it all there. And his collection was probably the weakest. I thought Laura stepped out a lot but didn't get near Jeffrey or even Uli. There's an article in the Washington Post talking about how Project Runway is great reality t.v. because it doesn't pander to entertainment. Jeffrey was the ass all season and he still won because he had the best designs in the end.

- Listening to John Mayer and John Legend's new albums. I mean like really listening, not just going through it once and then jumping on an opinion. I'm sure Rell will be breaking down John Legend's album soon on here. Right off the bat it's not as good as his debut, but expectations were out the roof.

Sports Announcers Are Geniuses

To some this may come as a surprise, to others not so much. Here's SI.com's list of the 17 dumbest things Sports Announcers have said while on the air. It's amazing how many of these faux pas have come from baseball players. This doesn't even count all the stupid things sports casters have said while airing highlight shows like SportsCenter. That would be a whole bag of goodies.(Keith Hernandez to the right who made a sexist comment when he saw a female in a Padres dugout; I'm still waiting on someone to comment that 65 year old men look funny in baseball uniforms even when they have no chance of playing in a game)

"Vote No On Amendment 42"

This comes to us courtesy of Ginny (a former contributor) and the wonderful mountain people of Colorado.

Some of the election commercials, this election season, have been the funniest in memory.

Check THIS ONE, out.

Inquiring minds needn't look further

Scholars have recorded historic documents, written books on both subjects, had roundtable discussions, comprised extensive position papers and debated this issue for quite some time. In doing so, if nothing else, they have given us one clear answer: The answer to this discussion will always boil down to one thing, opinion.

The answer I have selected isn't radical like the rants that a lot of people have come to expect from me. But, before I go further, I would like to offer a little background to this debate. At least, that way you have ammo, should you decide to disagree with my position.

The strategies Booker T. Washington and W.E.B Dubois chose, were mostly revealing of the conditions that they faced during their lifetime. You can clearly see the reason for the difference in perspective when exploring a little further into the lives of each individual.

Dubois was a free-born citizen from slave-owning parents in Massachusetts, and possessed a Ph.D from Harvard (and Bachelor's - Cum Laude, naturally). To put it mildly, he was not the typical black male living in America during the late 1800's. Knowing that, you could see how being born into slavery in Franklin County, Virginia - might somewhat influence Mr. Washington's take on "bringing himself up by the bootstraps." That's because - for Washington, it was not quite as easy.

Balancing the task of learning how to read and write, with the rigors of maintaining a manual labor job, is an impressive story of perseverance - regardless of era (look at the absurd amount of our children that are falling behind in their reading development, and they aren't even bogged down with doing sweatshop labor). For Washington, the only good that could come from intellectuality and liberal arts education, would be the ability to philosophize about his plight while writing poetry. That's not exactly the outcome he was looking for.

And while it is true that he eventually had a degree from Harvard, it was an honorary one, and he earned through diligence and work ethic. This is where I derive my opinion on the issue. Both were right. In fact, at it's most basic level, one could take Washington's solution and place Dubois' proposal directly following it. Which is why the combined elements of both have led to the most significant achievements thus far.

The people Washington appealed to were those without fundamental education, or trades to establish a better of living. For Dubois to ever realize his vision of intellectuality, he must first have an audience in a position to make that step. Placing a poor southern share-cropper in Harvard is like handing an Eskimo in an igloo a laptop computer. Now, a share-cropper trained into an established trade, more specifically his children - who would be brought up with an education, could begin bridging the gap between the two gentleman's arguments.

That's exactly what began to happen. The touching stories of young men and women being the first in their family to graduate college have become less and less common. It's transitioned more and more into stories like kids that select the rival of their parent's alma mater, or "daughter of (insert notable alumni name here) earns scholarship."

Now, granted it isn't nearly at the level that it should be, nor is it extremely close to being so. But it is progress. It is the progress we see each day. And that, is a testament to the merit of both of their suggestions.



*****
I feel many people are far too critical of Washington, because he did in fact, use an accommodating approach. What is important to remember, is that much of his ability to even have a public opinion, came from him being forced to act this way for much of his own life. I have a sinking suspicion it was simply a strategic move. Afterall, what were his chances of having a white owned publishing company put his book into print - had he not? I can't say for certain if he really felt that way or not. Nobody really can. But I do know that it was a very small piece of a much larger idea. And an important one at that.

Booker T. Washington vs. W.E.B Dubois

Nearly 100 years have passed since their ideologies clashed concerning the best way to improve the plight of African-Americans.

Dubois said we could show white people we were their equals through intellectualism and liberal arts education. Here's the full text of Dubois' The Souls of Black Folk.


And Mr. Dubois' response to Mr. Washington is here.

Washington said that the only way we could become equal was to create our own businesess, learn trades and create an economic base in which we owned the capital, land and economic resources. Here's Washington's Up From Slavery in full text.

So I ask you -- a 100 years later, who won? Who had the best suggestion? Was there a best suggestion? Were they both right?

Inquiring minds want to know.

Election Update: Ohio

So the RNC bailed on DeWine by pulling ad time, according to Chris at The Fix. Looks bad for my first prediction. And there's an interesting feature story about Sherrod Brown and his wife.

Our Country Ad

Does this offend you?



I think it's strange that they picked some negative American moments to go with some positive attitudes for such a happy song, but offended? Nah. Well, some people are.

A Real Plan for Action

***Preface***
I know, I know, this isn'’t customary at all - but I simply can't help myself. As a newcomer to this Blog I feel as if I should somewhat introduce myself to the readers out there, particularly the ones making a valiant effort to stop and read this post (thanks mom!). As such, I thought to myself: what better way to delve into a first post than to go against the grain? That'’s why I took it upon myself to shift gears out of the domestic politics that have lately become a staple of this Blog (Okay fine, and Transformers). Instead I have elected to randomly discuss a multinational affair involving Kim Jong-Il, and one that isn't [entirely] humorous!


Enjoy!
***End Preface***


Plan of action
We have all felt, to some degree, the ramifications of the nuclear tests conducted by North Korea. It is even possible that there may never be a consensus among the public about what has lead us to this. For that matter, there may never be a consensus as to whether or not the test was really part of a secret operation by the U.S. in some kind of conspiracy!!!! … sigh. What matters now is that we move towards a solution (ideally one that doesn't result in suicide bombers in metropolitan environments)


Responding without escalating the violence
Unfortunately, that is task that hasn't come easily for any of our leadership. Nor should it. It is an involved process with multiple variables and carries enormous ramifications for global peace. I, personally would prefer that they take a night to "“sleep on it" instead of haphazardly making such a crucial policy verdict. After all, they are handing down a decision that could disastrously change all of human life, as we know it.


The factors involved
Quite simply, the basic tenants of international peace are being challenged. Now they must be adapted to the new landscape of nuclear diplomacy, all the while, striving to subdue a potential nuclear altercation. I myself set out to find a reputable response to this complex, important question. I won'’t lie; it was a tedious project to tackle. Nonetheless, thanks to a little Game Theory, avoidance of groupthink and being, well, my awesome self, I have finally settled on one position.



My Plan
First and foremost - one element must remain status quo. Denying any bilateral talks with North Korea must be firmly upheld (and I believe it will). The reason this is so essential is that North Korea leaps at every opportunity it has to incite an actual retaliatory statement from the US. Still, we must resist the urge to bomb this country into the stone age.
For further proof, simply watch the outcome following the joint UN panel, which passed the multinational sanctions against North Korea. Afterwards, the North Korean Representative stood up, and as he was walking out, turned to say that "any further retaliation from the United States would be viewed as a declaration of war." Even an occasion as far stretched as this, they desperately try to insinuate that nobody, other than the United States, caused these sanctions; naturally, the representative overlooked the fact that 5 other countries signed the pact. Nope, the U.S. is accountable for all of it. At least that is North Korea's diseased political stance.




An extremely rare likeness of Kim Jong-Il, where he is not adorned in one his signature, highly fashionable, summer dresses








What makes it so absurd is that this remarkably unintelligent response came after we had withdrawn from any of North Korea's requested "bilateral talks." We did so, because we knew these same "talks" would probably be misconstrued as an a aggressive move, and exploited by Kim Jong-Il to gain bargaining leverage - so that he can access the new line of Fendi's women's clothing. Returning to seriousness, they have made the transparency of their agenda overwhelming. They are clinging desperately to any possible hope of a legitimate cause for war, for the sole purpose of using violence as a means of negotiation. Let's not give it to them.


With that established it's time to move on to the most important strategic goal we face; we must defend the safety of all nations impacted by this threat. Before you rush to discard the proposal as appeasement or not delivering an adequate punitive action; attempt to understand the rationale behind attempting this approach.


It is an established fact that we face a very realistic possibility for a regional arms race. It has developed so far, that Japan has released internal data regarding the timetable needed for creating a formidable nuclear arsenal. Regardless of the fears, we still face a very realistic opportunity to stop such an arms race. We can even do so, with the added bonus of improving our relationships with all countries involved.


This is how we accomplish these goals
The solution requires remarkably minimal effort, yet it is a hugely symbolic gesture on our behalf. The U.S. needs to make an official declaration - not to North Korea - but to the regional countries that are within range of a North Korean missile strike. In this declaration we must firmly commit to the defense of these countries from any North Korean aggression. By doing so, also assure them that they fall under the umbrella of our absurdly-destructive-nuclear-weaponry.


Why is this so important?
It'’s quite simple. Unlike the citizenry, the leadership in these affected nations is not particularly eager to incur a bill for a multi-billion dollar defense program. Moreover, even if they were to embark on such a commitment, none would ever build an arsenal rivaling the one we already possess. Under such circumstances they would realize that it would be redundant/wasteful for them to needlessly initiate a plan for arms development.


The pay off
Perhaps the greatest feat stemming from this strategy isn'’t even sanctioning North Korea (for the first time with UN member nations adopting uniform policies, mind you). No, I would contend that the most positive element comes from the strengthening of our relationship with the rest of the world. The tremendous repair that it would do for our international relationships is key factor for our country; it will be necessary if we are to ever gain outside endorsement for our international policies. The multilateral negotiations involve countries that are frequently voicing strong disagreement with the U.S. policy goals. As a result of this redeemed alliance, the possibility of restoring our international legitimacy is truly amazing. If it all still seems too far-fetched, and the bold predictions simply don'’t pan out in your mind - then I propose the following question to you. Can you imagine how much more effective we would be in our foreign initiatives with endorsements from China, Japan and India?


To summarize, we can halt a regional arms race. We can restore our weakened relationships with multiple countries. We can "“tell" Kim Jong-Il that his country will be liquidated the moment he becomes aggressive, without actually saying anything to him at all! In other words, we will solve a myriad of internal problems, save millions lives abroad and do so at virtually no cost.


Sounds like a plan to me!

Think you got a good Halloween Costume?



Any other ideas for Halloween Costumes?

Hello Tennessee, N.J. & Connecticut

Leading up the elections I've been breaking down a few of the closest races -- Senate or otherwise -- in America. It's kind of like a sporting event except it doesn't depend on a rocket-canon arm or a jumper. It's about words and what you say, who you say it to and what the other guy/girl says. And the spectators get to play, if they want.

Right now, Slate.com thinks that the Senate is at 49-49 (Democrats v. Republicans)with two races way too close to call. Missouri is one of those.

Today I break down three races. The other toss up state, you ask?

Tennessee

The race is on to fill Bill Frist's seat (R - Senate Majority Leader) between Harold Ford, Jr. (D) and Bob Corker (R). Ford has outperformed what everyone else thought he could do coming over from the House, to the tune of hold a slight 43-42 lead. Corker ran for this spot before and lost to Frist in the primary. Instead he took a spot as a mayor and working for the Governor.

Bush's numbers from 2004 show Bush's (R) 57% to Kerry's (D) 43%, which show the power of the good ole South. Even worse was the 2000 Senate elections that saw Frist winning 65-32.

More recent polls have Ford ahead, while polls released on the same day have Corker ahead. Both within the margins. A five-poll average, according to Slate, means Ford has a 47-44 lead. I missed the 2nd debate on Tuesday night, but will probably watch it and report more. Here's what one reporter thought of it.

The Fix rates this as No. 7.

My prediction: Ford takes this by 3




New Jersey

New Jersey is ranked No. 6 by my boy Chris Cillizza over at The Fix on Washingtonpost.com. Incumbent Bob Menendez (D) (on the right in the picture) is surging in this race, according to most sources after slinging mud for the longest time with state Sen. Tom Kean, Jr. (R). Slate puts the race at 45-41 in favor of Menendez, who has showed some separation speed since the beginning of October. Menendez broke out Mr. Obama on Thursday to campaign for him. But Mr. Kean's campaign ads tell us how clutch he is.

Part of the blame on Kean's troubles have come from the Foley Scandal. But he's breaking ranks with the big-name Republicans to try to get back into the mix. He called for the resignation of Hastert and Rumsfeld.

Kean might be running the most interesting Republican campaign in that he has shifted the focus away from Iraq, instead of being a "stay the course" kind of guy. But the climate may be too tough for him to push his tax plans, state ethics and Menendez ties to N.J. problems.

Prediction: Menendez stays on the top and keeps his seat by 4.5.




Connecticut

My man Joe Lieberman (Independent) is crushing the same guy that beat him in the Democratic primary to the tone of 51-38. I won't even bother putting the other guy's name on here. Here's his web site if you care.

What the guy did in the primary was basically turn it into a one-issue race, Iraq. It was a close battle but Lieberman lost because he supported staying in Iraq until things are more stable. And while I may disagree with that particular issue, I do not believe in getting rid of a good Senator over one issue and putting some bandwagoner in his place. Senators make a lot more decisions in 6 years than on just one issue. So Lieberman lost all his Democratic ties and friends because he went Independent. No help from Clinton or any Democratic big rigs. And he's still going to win.

Prediction: Lieberman covers by 15.

Recap: DeWine (Republican - By 2 percent), Talent (R-3), Ford (D-3), Menendez (D-4.5) and Lieberman (I-15). I'm in trouble with DeWine already and not looking good for Talent with word that Democrats and independents are fired up about voting this week.

Get the Hate Out Of Your System!

I say that to, my fellow black people. The time for us discriminating (and that's what it is) on a white artist because they are playing "our music," should come to an end soon.

They've played "our music" forever, from Jazz to Rock N'Roll to now Hip-Hop, the most creative forms of black music always get exploited by the mainstream. And mainstream usually = white people.

However, I must side with our caucasian brothers on something, why is that we constantly hate on artists like Justin Timberlake, Joss Stone, Christina Aguilera and John Mayer?

Is it because they play music that is fused with more soul than most black artists can muster these days? Is it because they are doing a better job making "our" music right now than we are? What are the reasons?

For Timberlake, most people say "he didn't defend Janet and that was grimey." Wow, he didn't defend Janet after they agreed to expose her nipple in front of about 1 billion people. Just a horrible thing to do.

As bad as it was, I can think of 15 black artists who have done things just so horrible and disgusting -- yet we continue to buy their music.

You know the example I'm going to use -- Robert "R" Kelly. I mean this dude had urinal relations (attribution Uncle Rukus)with a 13-year-old girl and yet his albums that have come out since that happened, five years ago, have been his BEST SELLING!!!

Snoop Dogg has been tried for 2nd degree murder, assault and recently just finished the 10th movie of his pornographic film series "Doggystyle" yet "Drop It Like It's Hot" was his best song on the Billboard chart ever.

Not to pick on those too, but we as a people (black people) need to appreciate the music. I don't care if you think their intentions are bad or you think they are "using" us, whatever that's garbage.

If it's good, it's good -- who cares what color you are?




(I expect to get negative feedback on this, but hey, it's how I feel. Just enjoy the music)

Yahoo! Digital Time Capsule

I like what Yahoo! is doing here. They are starting a digital time capsule that will hold ive terabytes of data to be submitted to Smithsonian, sealed until 2020.

To contribute, go here.

Full Story

Excerpt:
A childhood photograph of a man with a mother he hasn't spoken with in 20 years, an Argentinean's proclamation of his love for "The Simpsons" and a tune from the Boston punk band Darkbuster are among the early submissions to Yahoo Inc.'s digital time capsule.

The company is accepting words, pictures, videos, sounds and drawings from anyone around the world. It plans to seal about 5 terabytes of data — equivalent to the text of roughly 5 million books — until the company's 25th anniversary in 2020.

"RELLavent" TV -- The Final List (Updated)

So, basically all the new shows have premiered and we've had time to digest them. Here are the shows I (Rell) watch or DVR and watch later. Also, most of the time I'll try and catch the Colbert Report and the Daily Show Monday-Thurs.

Monday - Heroes - 9 p.m. on NBC, Monday Night Football 8:30 p.m. on ESPN. 24 - Fox 9 p.m. (beginning in January) Obviously the DVR is going to be very busy.

Tuesday - Honestly there isn't anything for me to watch on Tuesday nights. Once B-ball season starts I'll be good, but Tuesday night might become the designated "reading night."

Wednesday -LOST - 9 p.m. on ABC, The Nine 10 p.m. on ABC, South Park - 10 p.m. on Comedy Central

Thursday - Six Degrees - 10 p.m. on ABC, The Office - 8:30 p.m. on NBC

Friday - (I'm not ever home to watch but DVR saves me again) Numb3ers - 10 p.m. on CBS

Saturday - College Football

Sunday - Everybody Hates Chris - 8 p.m. on the CW, Family Guy - 9 p.m. on Fox

Last In: Numb3rs
Last Out: Studio 60
Potential Additions: Studio 60 and Daybreak

Breakdown by Networks
ABC - 3
Comedy Central - 3
NBC - 2
Fox - 2
The CW - 1
CBS - 1



Mike T additional input here.

I don't have the DVR that Rell does, so my list is much shorter.
Studio 60 (Monday 10 p.m. NBC), Project Runway (Wednesday 10 p.m. BRAVO), LOST, and The Amazing Race (CBS 8 p.m. Sunday). I would also put My Name is Earl on the list if I didn't have class at that time or if I had tivo.

And as a note to Rell, did you know CW switched all their comedy shows because they did so horribly in the first week? Monday to Sunday or Sunday to Monday. I can't remember exactly.

This Post May Be An Act of War

North Korea ratcheted up what was a decently tense situation today by proclaiming that sanctions would be considered an act of war. And they would retaliate with their new toy and the world's fifth-largest army. This has got to be the most eccentric regime in the history of the world, run by a guy that has to have people look at him. I still think the greatest fear is North Korea selling the weapon to a bin laden-like group. But we will see.

Team America (for Rell, Maybe Not Safe for Work):

Russia Going Dictatorial Again?

I debated on whether to post this or not, and I usually don't mess with single stories that are isolated incidents. (We like global/domestic affairs but we figure you can read the news like anyone else. We try to sift through it a bit.) But with the release of The J Curve by Ian Bremmer and many people's thinking that Iraq was more stable with a dictator, I thought I would bring it up.

Russia made news over the weekend as one of the leading journalist was murdered. She was an outspoken critic of Putin and had a "big story" in the works about how bad things have gotten in Russia. But the best part is there was no comment from The Kremlin & Mikhail Gorbachev is part owner of the newspapers. The Former Soviet leader said, "It is a savage crime against a professional and serious journalist and a courageous woman. It is a blow to the entire democratic, independent press. It is a grave crime against the country, against all of us." So Russia could be slipping back to a more totalitarian state. That might be a bit frightening.

The J Curve is an interesting concept and probably a great read. It talks about stability and how some governments stabilize themselves via different kinds of governments. It's currently on #196 on Amazon's list of books, since it is about foreign affairs. But here we like to assume that are readers are bright and the people that have to face 60 years of choices for America. Here's a story on Bremmer if you are interested.

And like Forest Gump said, "That's all I have to say about that."

Great Movies You Hate

Entertainment Weekly had a story up this week about great movies -- without the ridiculous praise and applause from everyone you know -- but when you go and see them you think, "That sucked." So here's there list of movies that were "great" but you hated or didn't buy the hype:

- The Blair Witch Project ("I thought I was going to literally barf while watching it because of the camera jiggling. And whiny Heather? Die, already!" — Jennifer)

- A Beautiful Mind ("If I had my choice between this and two hours of high school trigonometry, it'd be a tough call."- Mike Slezak)

- Jerry Maguire ("Between Tom's perpetual 'I'm determined to look determined' smirk and Renée's completely uninteresting character and inability to spit out sentences without chewing the insides of her cheeks, I end up looking anywhere other than the screen whenever this movie's on." - Annie)

- The Matrix ("A clichéd mish-mash of concepts drawn from every sci-fi film ever made. Empty, soulless performances. And lots of money blown on slow-mo chop-socky action that Bruce Lee could do for real." — John)

- Dances With Wolves (The late critic Pauline Kael said it best: "Costner has feathers in his hair and feathers in his head.")

- Forrest Gump ("Forrest Gump: An idiot's view of history, made for idiots." — Fredd Kross)

- American Beauty (Maybe the most aggressively pretentious movie I've ever seen. Heavy-handed, trite, and filled with one maudlin cliché after another." — A)

So what are yours? I'd say the Matrix because of Keanu Reeves foolishness and the sequels proved how hapless the first one really was; it was only deep because you wanted it to be)

Jay-Z Internet Leakage

A couple of sources had Jay-Z first release off his upcoming Nov. album, Kingdom Come. You might have to follow a few of them before you can hear the song, but thought I would pass it along.

When Does Caring Too Much Become Problematic?

So, that awful Daniel Powder (I know it's not Powder, I'm just making a joke)song "Bad Day" is really ringing true to me about now.

The day, Sunday, started off pretty well. I went home for church, got to play my saxophone with the musicians and my cousins (which is a form of therapy) and got to see a lot of family. That's a great start to the day, but I was very eager to get home to watch my team (Dallas) against the Eagles, the much-discussed return of T.O. that has been talked about so much.

Suffice to say that the game was frustrating. 1) Troy Aikman and Mr. Buck just kept talking about T.O. like he was the anti-christ. Dude just wants to win and it just so happens that the best way for the teams he has been on to win, is for him to be successful. It's true, I don't care what anyone says. But everytime he even winked, stood up, moved, turned left or right they conscrewed it to be some negative emotion or frustration and I absolutely hate that. 2) Drew Bledsoe is the most cardboard cutout like quarterback in NFL history. Refrigerator Perry probably can run the 40 in a faster time then Bledsoe. HE just stands in the pocket and stands in the pocket and stands in the pocket until he a) throws an interception or b) gets sacked.

That's the way it ALWAYS ends with him. Interception or sack. That's the way the game ended, from potential 31-31 tie, to a 38-24 philly win after 102-yard interception return for a touchdown by Eagles cornerback Lito Sheppard.

Couple the T.O.-Dallas-Bledsoe frustration with the fact that my University (UNC-Chapel Hill) has quite possibly the worst football program in Division I and this weekend has just been horrible.

It's Sunday night at 9:16 p.m. and quite honestly these two sporting events have put me in one of the most foul moods I've been in, in quite sometime.

So, I ask -- when does caring about sports/teams/hobbies too much become a problem? When should you/I take a step back and say "it's just a game, it's not that serious."

Caveat... I plan to work in athletics at the collegiate lever after I finish getting my masters in athletic administration.

Hello Missouri: McCaskill vs. Talent

We apologize if we're coming at you with politics. But it's October and the year is an even number. 30 days...So here we go.

Introductions are in order for Sen. Jim Talent (R - Missouri) who holds $6 million in the bank and has already dropped $12 million on this race. Wait. Show me, What!? St Louis is shelling out the cash for this guy. The Challenger is state auditor Claire McCaskill (Democrat) who is fighting with $1.8 million and about $2 million on hand for the stretch.

And right now the race is knotted up at 43-43 in the polls (49-43, 45-43 in favor of Talent in others). That likely means that as much as 13 percent represents the number of undecideds out there. Most people say simply that this is the Senate race that will show the closest tallies when it all ends on election day. Washingtonpost.com's The Fix (Chris Cillizza) has this race as No. 5, raising a few spots since last the odds were made. Ohio stayed at No. 3 in those rankings.

The two candidates squared off on "Meet the Press" Sunday morning. What's the key issue here? Anyone want to guess... Yep. Iraq & Bush. Talent is a pure "stay the course" guy and McCaskill is a "time for change" kind of woman. The American public right now is strongly in support of McCaskill's side.

Stem Cell research is also on the table here with Talent being against the research, although he allows for the rape exemption in some abortion legislation. Russert brought it up No. 3 after Foley and Iraq.

"This election is about changing direction," said Claire McCaskill, citing Talent's 94% voting percentage with President Bush. Transcript and video here.

The reason we are highlighting this race is because it's between two articulate candidates, debating the issues. Both are clean and scandal free. No dirt to throw. How wonderful that is.

Again I'm going to go with the better politican, though McCaskill has got more pop than Sherrod Brown (Democratic candidate for Ohio), and pick Talent. But really that's just an educated guess on where the undecideds will fall.

Prediction II: Talent in 51-49. I'm taking no chances on the spread. (Recap: Last week I took DeWine in Ohio; Rell took Sherrod Brown by 4 in Ohio)

Speaking of Gas

We like to pass on good stories when we read them. This comes from the NY Times about energy consumption in America as one guy sets out with his family of five to decrease his by just 5 percent. That's about like losing 10 pounds if you are a 200 pound person. No biggie. And I'm not even close to being a tree hugger and I like the sentiment here.
Like most dieters, I cut deals with myself. If you’re trying to lose real weight, you vow, say, to give up beer and ice cream but retain your pizza rights. Since I was trying to emit less CO2, I vowed to lower the thermostat at night by one degree — not two, as often recommended by tree-huggers — a tweak I expected none of us would notice. (That saved 79 pounds; each degree equals approximately 315 pounds of CO2; turning it down only at night, for the six colder months, or ¼ times 315). In return? No more guilt over TV size.

He started with things like expensive light bulbs but gave that up after his house starting to look like it was lit like a train station. He did simple things: canceled catalog subscriptions, stopped letting the shower run, change from hot/hot to hot/cold when doing laundry and some other easy things.
On our way to the Lowe's cashier, we passed an aisle with motion sensors, and I remembered my brother had them in his bathrooms, where they shut off the lights soon after people left. They seemed an easy enough item to buy and install. I called my brother, Marc. “Be honest,” I said. “Will there be re-wiring?” My brother, an astrophysicist, said no, there wouldn’t be; then something to the effect that, unless I was too stupid to remove a light switch plate and put another one on, I was fully capable.

“Wait,” I said. “Why does anyone need a motion sensor in their bathroom? Don’t people turn the light on when they go in and turn it off when they leave?”

“Ah,” he said. “You don’t have teenagers yet.”
Links from the story: thegreenguide.com & stopglobalwarming.org & Climate Crisis

Chlorine Evacuation in Apex

I was checking up on Drudge Report late tonight about some of his scoops and saw this about Apex. I don't know what's going on around there, but that is serious stuff and absolutely deadly. WRAL is reporting that a state of emergency has been declared and evacuations are under way because of a gas leak from a chemical plant. Early reports say 16,000 people have been asked to move, plus flights have been routed around the gas plume. Now that's a scary phrase. It probably won't be in the morning papers, but it's definitely a big deal.

Starbucks Got that Ambition, Baby

Look at his eyes. They're ruby red from caffeine overdose. Starbucks announces that it will be doubling stores in North America. Headline reads: Starbucks to double North American stores, presumably by stacking new stores on top of existing ones. I posted this cause 1. it's crazy 2. the headline is funny 3. I incorporated Kanye effectively as we should all do.

Also in the announcement was that Itunes and Starbucks are teaming up to allow the coffee chain's catalog online. So take your Ipod to Starbucks and hand over your money for music and a buzz. Any guesses on where this corporate relationship could go?

See No Evil

Was reading up on some of these Congressmen who have been blantantly and overtly racist during their tenures. If you've never heard of the Southern Poverty Law Center, they basically fight hate groups (of all races) and attempt to bankrupt them via litigation and things of that nature.

Check out "The Intelligence Report" on their Web site and do some research on Hate Groups, Supremacy groups and the links your congressman could possibly have with them.

Elected officials associated with the Council of Conservative Citizens (CCC), a group that has written that blacks are "a retrograde species of humanity," attacking "Jewish power brokers," publishing anti-Semites like Edgar J. Steele, and comparing pop singer Michael Jackson to an ape.

Elected Officials Connected to the CCC

Excerpt:
The Center's Intelligence Project is dedicated to monitoring hate groups and extremist activity in the U.S.

It also publishes the Intelligence Report, a quarterly magazine updating law enforcement, the media, and the public on the activity it investigates.

The Project has also established law enforcement training to help officers identify and respond to hate crimes.

Originally called Klanwatch, the Intelligence Project was created in 1981 in response to an incident two years earlier. During a peaceful march in Decatur, Alabama, Klan members attacked civil rights activists. Curtis Robinson, a black man, shot a Klansman in self-defense. When Robinson was convicted of assault with intent to murder by an all-white jury, the Center appealed his conviction and brought its first civil suit against the Klan.

What's Not Right?

Young Singers Spread Racist Hate

Twilla passed this on and it has some serious gems in it. I will say this, though what they say is stupid, ignorant and offensive -- the fact that they can say it makes America great. Also, it's another reason I LOVE Dave Chappelle [no homo].

What these losers have to realize (even though their only 13) is that the White Supremacy movement doesn't scare us anymore. This isn't 1932, you come at me I've got something for you, regardless of who you are or what organization you're with.

Duo Considered the Olsen Twins of the White Nationalist Movement

When asked about their inspiration for their latest efforts, Lynx gave this response. "I saw white people hating white people. I was afraid that Americawanted to be black, " said Lynx. "I saw that funny nigger's show where hemade a mockery of the KKK and white people were laughing. This broke my
heart."

Lynx was speaking of Actor/Comedian Dave Chapelle and his comic sketch
depicting a blind, African American, Ku Klux Klan leader who was unaware
that he was not white. Dave Chapelle is also believed to be the inspiration
of their single, "Funny Nigger, " which describes the gruesome fate of
blacks who taunt whites. Dave Chapelle was not availible for comment.


Track Listing for "End Of A Black World"

1) Dawn of A New White World
2) Birth Of A Nation
3) Purest Soul
4) Tainted Blood
5) Affirmative Blaction
6) Reggin & Ekik
7) The Cleansing (interlude)
8) Short Drop and A Quick Stop
9) Burning Cross
10) N.A.A.C.P. (Niggers Against A Colorless People)
11) Funny Rich Nigger
12) Crack Babies
13) Nigger Lovers
14) No Darkie In Me (this one might be that heat)
15) End Of A Black World
16) Hess' Prayer

The very model of a modern Studio (60)


With Rell's shows and my shows, we are all about t.v. around here. But to be honest, there is such goodness on television that it's hard to say that television is not in a better state than the movies. Production values for shows like Lost, Hero, 24, CSI, Kidnapped, Studio 60 and the like are equal to most of the stuff on the big screen. And it's easier to watch t.v. cause if you are watching, you are probably invested in the characters without having to wade through backplot. So that brings me to my review of Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip, Monday nights at 10 p.m. on NBC. It took a huge punch in the gut this week as the ratings fell dramatically, but I have no doubt it will retain. The Monday night slot is a bit weird in that it would be better suited Tuesday-Thursday or an hour earlier. But I have no doubt.

Before watching the first episode, I was long convinced that Aaron Sorkin is the best writer in television -- and maybe Hollywood. Sports Night and The West Wing have been the most proclaimed shows in the past several years, been thrown Emmy after Emmy even in their worst years. Sorkin wrote them and Thomas Schlamme directed and produced both those products. They got back together after a three year absense, since Sorkin broke with The West Wing after drug and power rumors. Because of my love of those behind the camera, I decided to hold up my review for three episodes. Enough about my disclaimer; to the show.

Episode 1 started with a blast as a live studio show is highjacked by it's producer as he rants against television as it stands, stopping the show in mid air. It's brilliant drama, aside from the diatribe which does actually make you think. That is Sorkin's dual ability to make you think and entertain you at once -- but you don't have to do both if you wish. The rest of the show revolves around what's the move for the show, which means new writer/producer/president (Whitford/Perry/Peet). The banter and dialogue between characters is quick and witty, especially between Matthew Perry and Bradley Whitford. (Both appeared in The West Wing, though Perry did as a break from that other famous NBC show). Amanda Peet added to the dialogue while the rest of the cast kind of watched. The humor can be similiar to Friends in delivery, but the show most definitely is drama center -- only compelled by humor through the scene. The hook from scene to scene remains drama and conflict.

As far as character development, Perry and Whitford's characters (Matt and Danny, respectively) show dimension already going past the "talented" and "brilliant" titles that everyone supposes. Sorkin goes on to show them as vulnerable and bounded to each other for their creative enterprise. It sets up beautifully for plots about conflicts and collaborations between the two main characters. The success of the show depends in part on liking these two guys and believing their characters march as Sorkin writes them to march.

There's the trick with Sorkin towards his character in this way: he will tell you something simple like "hilarious and brilliant" and only show bits of it by cutting the scenes and arranging them as he does. So instead of showing clip after clip cut from the SNL-like show, Sorkin will tease the best parts and make you believe that the parts of the clip you don't see were just as funny. He did this with The West Wing by showing parts of The President's speeches or discussions with his staff. But would never allow you into the world long enough that it might spoil it for you. He'll never leave you in a scene too long that you start to doubt the capacity of his characters. As much of a tease as that may seem to be, it works brilliantly for an ensemble cast in an hour-long drama.

The second show begins with a 2-minute clip, an introduction to the SNL-like show, in the form of song and dance. It's parody and satire. But it's enough to tempt you to imagine what the other 1:25:00 of the show would be like. It's quite funny, so take a look. Sorkin stays away from a sketch called "Crazy Christians" which is alluded to as the reason for the shake up in the first scene of the first episode. Sorkin knows that no matter how good the humor of that one, it would never live up to the hype. So he leaves it out.

The 2nd and 3rd show continue on the usual Sorkin path, propelled by the plot of the first show and developing the characters as they go along. Jordan McDeere, Peet's character, caught some backstory as we watched her get invested with the two main characters while showing about her history. We see Matt and Danny go through the struggles of producing the show, trying to regain its form of the glory years. Typical behind-the-scenes debate and conflict about how to fill the show, how to handle the characters that weren't entirely evolved from the first episode like DL Hughley and the other cast members. To be honest, outside of Peet, Perry, Whitford and Timothy Busfield the characters haven't been developed to much depth. Or they are weak when they do appear on the screen. I'm waiting to find a reason to love DL's character but can't say that I even know his name. Steven Weber and Sarah Paulson's characters are not quite there yet for the audience to catch. Weber is likely a huge bust in that his character hasn't given anything we couldn't get from a cardboard box with "Network Executive" typed across his chest. Paulson seems like someone we could eventually love; give Sorkin one full show about her to prove it.

And most of these characters are just waiting for an episode about them to fulfull their depth. That's a style that Sorkin mastered that LOST helped mainstream. The audience will fall to the characters that they like, and the ones they don't be gone. Only Sorkin has typically been good enough that he doesn't have to go to the character's home and lifestory for you to relate to them. West Wing only left the center stage of the White House's Senior Staff circle once or twice; and one of those was poetically about Alzheimer's disease.

If the show is going to be like the West Wing or other ensemble shows like Lost or Grey's Anatomy, there must be 6 or more relatable characters. It's the bare minimum in t.v. these days. Right now I have seen 5 through three episodes. But for many of these other shows it takes more time than that. So Sorkin and Studio 60 are way above the curve. I only wonder if the bar has been set too high or that nothing cna match the expectations.

But with three shows out there, it's hard to find many shows that have as good of writing as it does. With a slew of precision and sharpness, it's above everything else but it's not gimmicky. There are no murder mysteries like Desperate Housewives/Kidnapped/24 or thousands of unsolvable questions like LOST or love lines between beloved characters like Grey's or fighting/action in the course of action. It relies simply on writing and characters, the way The West Wing came past politics and the Oval Office. You likely won't see the characters at home on a night off or going on a family vacation, because Sorkin is good enough to show the characters in the setting he's choosen. This time it's a SNL-like show set in Hollywood.

I have no doubt it will get better, and I'll be more amazed. It's No. 2 on my list behind LOST. I only wonder if the rest of America will be with me. NBC.com is replaying the show in its entirety if you want to watch or missed it.

Register to Vote

I know most people here have already registered to vote, but if you live somewhere new or haven't done so, here's a chance. This is the last week in most states to register. It's as easy as filling out a form and showing up in Nov. But you don't get to complain if you don't.

Why The Future of Television is Lost

Time.com -- who we must admit are experts at this sort of thing, has a great article on
"Lost" and what it means to TV in an era where television was thought to be losing it's appeal. Check it out...

How a weird cult show that should have been canceled helped TV into the new-media era


Excerpt:
TV has seen plenty of shows with Lost's geek appeal, but their stories usually end with "... and it was soon canceled, to the dismay of its hard-core fans." The Prisoner, the first Star Trek series--even Twin Peaks went from phenom to flame-out faster than you can say, Who killed Laura Palmer?
Lost is different.

An unapologetically knotty, mass-market commercial hit, it demands commitment--and gets it. How did Lost escape the cult-show graveyard? Partly because it's just TV genius. But also because TV has changed--and because Lost changed TV. Many of the changes that threatened old-fashioned TV--the rise of the Internet, new technologies, a fragmented audience with new entertainment options--have made Lost successful. It won over Internet-centric viewers who are supposed to be bored with TV, and it benefited from technologies like iTunes, DVRs and DVDs that some were worried would be the end of TV. It took the attributes that would once have made it a cult failure--eccentricity and complexity--and used them to harness the power of obsessive, evangelical fans. Like the story told in Lost, the story of the series' success is one of careful design, science and a little faith.

The mystery of Lost--and the opportunities for cyberanalysis--turned it into TV for the post-TV generation. Besides stoking interest, technology has affected the kind of storytelling Lost can do. On a practical level, DVRs, DVDs and iTunes downloads mean it's less likely fans will miss episodes, fall behind and give up, which allows the writers to keep the show complex and challenging. "A show that is as serialized as Lost would have had a much harder time pre-iPod, pre-DVD, pre-streaming video," says Abrams.

And those technologies allow the producers to add levels of detail. In a Season 2 episode, Eko (Adewale Akinnuoye-Agbaje), a former Nigerian drug lord, has a religious epiphany when he encounters the smoke monster in the jungle. Viewers who TiVoed the scene and played it in slow motion saw a series of images in the cloud: Eko's dead brother, a man Eko killed, a crucifix. The images flash by in fractions of a second. A casual viewer would not have noticed them at all. Either way, it works. You can sit back and enjoy the story, or you can play it, as if it were an adventure-puzzle game like Dungeons & Dragons or Myst.

For most of TV history, going to those lengths to get people who already like a show to like it more would have been a waste. Network TV is paid for by ads, and to advertisers, an eyeball is an eyeball, however passionate. But now you can turn passion into money. Fans buy episodes they missed, from iTunes at $1.99 a pop. They're the market for the upcoming video-game and cell-phone mini-episodes. They buy DVDs to catch new details of episodes they have already seen. This month Lost's Season 2 debuted at No. 1 on the DVD charts--listing at about $60 a set. Season 1 sold 1.2 million copies. The networks take notice when it comes time to schedule new series. "I'm not in the room when the corporate decisions are made," says Abrams. "But the possibility of making $50 [million], $100 million more on DVD sales--it's not a drop in the bucket."

Health Alert: Omega 3s

Today in the NY Times was a piece about Fish Oils, especially for the health of the heart. I'm sure if Tasha were still around, she'd tell you what most health nuts, nutritionists and scholarly people have known for a while, that fish oils (omega-3) in pill form or as a natural part of your diet can save your heart (and your life from Diabetes, stroke, weight loss, arthritis, depression, etc.). And since America has the hugest problem with Heart Disease and Obesity, here's your tip: Go to the grocery store and check the suppliment aisle if you are concerned or fall into one of the classes of people that likely will be affected by one of those diseases or health issues. From the article, here's why it's not commonly prescribed in the US (much like glucosomin/condrotin isn't):
“Most cardiologists here are not giving omega-3’s even though the data supports it — there’s a real disconnect,” said Dr. Terry Jacobson, a preventive cardiologist at Emory University in Atlanta. “They have been very slow to incorporate the therapy.”

The fact that heart patients receive such different treatments in sophisticated hospitals around the world highlights the central role that drug companies play in disseminating medical information, experts said.

Because prescription fish oil is not licensed to prevent heart disease in the United States, drug companies may not legally promote it for that purpose at conferences, in doctors’ offices, to patients or even on the Internet.

“If people paid more attention to guidelines, more people would be on the drug,” Dr. Jacobson said. “But pharmaceutical companies can’t drive this change. The fact that it’s not licensed for this has definitely kept doctors away.”
Sort of silly but you should recognize this fact about pharmaceutical companies and how they market to you. I'm a firm believer that everyone should take their health seriously and realize what they should be doing. Even if you don't want to live longer, living healther probably means you are having a better time each day.

Basically the fish oils work in the opposite way that saturated fats (potato chips, deep fried stuff, etc) work. The Omega 3 fatty acids (fish oils) unclog and clean up the blood stream. This is why cultures that have diets high in fishes, have virtually no heart problems. God bless nature for providing a fix.

Health podcast here.

Mini Earth

This can change your perspective if you don't think you are lucky to be alive in America. It helps when you remove vast numbers like 290 million and 6 billion from the equation.

Barack Obama on Politics, Race and Religion

The guy many believe will unite America from the conservative-republican, liberal-democrat partisan government we've been in for quite some time, set down with Newsweek's Howard Fineman for a candid interview.

I must say, I kind of feel for the guy. He seems to be the political/congressional version of the Matrix's "Neo." Everyone thinks he is "the one," but in reality he has to realize that "there is a difference between knowing the path and walking the path."

A Different Kind of Politics?

Excerpt:
On the campaign trail this fall, no one is a bigger draw—especially for young voters—than Sen. Barack Obama of Illinois. Of mixed racial and religious heritage, the 45-year-old Harvard Law School graduate strikes many Americans as a one-man answer to both the "clash of civilizations" and the Red-Blue chasm in America. Last week he spoke to a packed house at a MoveOn.org event hosted by Georgetown University students in regal Gaston Hall—a favorite venue for Democrats trying out ideas for presidential campaigns. In the green room afterward, Obama sat down with NEWSWEEK chief political correspondent Howard Fineman. Obama, who has been in the Senate for less than two years, did not slam the door on what would be a daring 2008 bid.

Why did you call your new book “The Audacity of Hope”?

Why is hope audacious?Because we live in some tough times. Because when you look around the world you see crisis in Darfur, you see conflagrations in the Middle East, you see political polarization at home, you’ve got environmental crisis, 46 million without health insurance, inner-city children that are trapped in despair. So you know I think it is easy sometimes to say that there is nothing much we can do about it. And you know that the title is a line that I got from a sermon my pastor gave once, which made the point that sometimes it’s easier to be cynical and give up hope. But part of our character as a nation has been a sense of optimism, a sense that we can overcome.

The reaction you get around the country is remarkable. Why are people reacting to you the way they are?


It’s always hard to stand outside yourself and know what it is that people are reacting to. Some of it is just dumb luck. I was elected based on a campaign that was positive and that was hopeful, and somehow it worked and it was multiracial and I got votes from farmers and I got votes from suburbanites and inner-city blacks. And I think that there is a hunger right now for America coming together, and my campaign sort of captured that wave, and I expressed it as best I could during my speech in the 2004 election and that seemed to resonate. It probably says less about me than an indication that people want a different kind of politics.

Do you worry that people are piling too many expectations and hopes on you?
Some people seem to say, “OK, there is an easy answer, it’s Barack Obama.”


I go back to the quote from the speech I just gave: Justice [Louis] Brandeis saying that “the most important office in a democracy is that of citizen.” I come from a community-organizing background and a civil-rights background. I always believe that ultimately, if people are paying attention, then we get good government and good leadership. And when we get lazy, as a democracy and civically start taking shortcuts, then it results in bad government and politics.

Someone I know played basketball with you at Harvard Law School, and he complimented you on your game. He said you ran the floor and shared the ball. How would you describe your game?

I was a slasher—somewhere between Allen Iverson and LeBron James, but keep in mind that the gym in law school was pretty short, shorter than regulation. The last time I played was actually in Djibouti, with [U.S.] troops. I was terrific for the first five minutes.

Hello Ohio: DeWine v. Brown

Good times are upon us. And if we have learned anything from the past elections: there are only a few states that are really ever in doubt. Penn., Ohio, Florida. Of course, I'm kidding in some sense, and in others I am not. So here is a breakdown of the fun that is happening in Ohio for a Senate seat between Republican Mike DeWine and Democratic challenger Sherrod Brown. According to the Boston Globe, Brown has taken a slight edge in the polls, 45-43, but that's within the margins.

This is one of the closest races in America this year. The Democrats need the seat to go along with several other key races if they want to take control of Congress, which is likely to come but maybe not until 2008.

The reason I like to look at this race is probably because it indicates a broader national trend. Ohio is just like that. And I watched part of the debate on Sunday's Meet the Press, easily the hardest interview in America. And arguably Mike DeWine won the debate because he sounded like a guy that knew his numbers, the legislation, the process and the trends, while Brown sounded like he was merely a politician trying to beat his opponent with whatever wedge he might find. But then it was pointed out that DeWine votes 93 to 96 % of the time with President Bush, up until last year. And Brown did a decent job at throwing a jab at that, linking DeWine to Bush, Bush to Iraq, Iraq to failures. And likely that's enough for Brown to stay near or above his opponent. Here's another version of how the debate went if you don't trust me.
SEN. DeWINE: The majority of times of those 10 times where Sherrod Brown voted to cut our intelligence spending, he was the minority even of his own party. In addition to that, Tim, we passed the Patriot Act. We all came together, passed it, 98-to-1 in the Senate. That means Ted Kennedy voted for it, John Kerry voted for it. Sherrod Brown in the House, was one of 66 members of the House to vote against the Patriot Act, and he continues to vote against the Patriot Act, to deny our law enforcement the tools they need to go against terror.

MR. RUSSERT: All right. I’m going to give him 30 seconds to respond to that, then I want to move to the future.

REP. BROWN: Well, the, the—again, the—on the intelligence, the intelligence...

MR. RUSSERT: But you voted against the Patriot Act?

REP. BROWN: I did vote against the Patriot Act. The Patriot Act had a lot of good things in it, but it, it, it went too far. And it’s, it’s not—the Patriot Act is law now, but we’ve not done what we should do in Afghanistan. We’ve not done what we should do to protect the United States of America. And clearly his focus has been “stay the course” in Iraq, the status quo in Iraq, and that has caused all other parts of the war on terror—it’s undermined all other parts of the war on terror, coupled with the fact the intelligence experts are saying the war in Iraq is making us less safe, Tim
.
The point being that the whole debate is over Iraq. The Democrats don't even have to come up with an exit strategy to win in November; they just have to keep punching it.

Prediction: DeWine's done but closes the gap by election day. Undecideds pick Brown on election day. Any other guesses?

LOST: Season 3 Promo

Took the Youtube player down for space reasons; go to http://www.youtube.com/v/ncmL1ITR01U.

NBC's "Heroes"

If you missed it,this show premiered (with limited commercial thanks to that piece of garbage car Nissan is pushing) Monday at 9 p.m. (I didn't watch it 'till Tuesday night, gotta see MNF)and is basically X-Men meets "Lost." I figured it would be either VERY GOOD or VERY BAD, often times for shows like this, there is NO middle ground.

Thankfully for me and luckily for NBC it was VERY GOOD, almost near great. In fact, it was the highest rated NBC Wednesday night program since 2001 -- which is saying something because NBC (before it turned itself into the ER/Law and Orders 1-7 network) was THE network growing up.

At any rate, it's another show that will be added to "RELLavent TV." The complete list of programs I recommend will be released sometime next week (like anyone really cares). But, Matthew Gilbert of the Boston Globe probably does a better job than me at telling why "Heroes" not only is a good show, but will have staying power and could become this year's "Lost." Don't you just love shows that make you think?

The powerful "Heroes" premiere will be rebroadcast on the SCI-FI Channel this Friday, September 29, at 7 p.m. ET

The strength of 'Heroes' is its psychological nuance

Excerpt:
This excellent new NBC series finds ordinary people -- a Texas cheerleader, a New York painter, a Las Vegas stripper -- evolving beyond the rest of the race. One is indestructible, one glimpses the future, one can fly -- and none is choking in a shiny, fibrous, synthetic material.

That lack of spandex is what makes "Heroes" stand out. The show isn't a comic-book series with an alien-based mythology and exaggerated facial expressions.

The series creator, Tim Kring , comes to this project from the non-sci-fi realm of "Crossing Jordan" and "Providence," and with an emphasis on character over action. Even the title, "Heroes" leans in that direction. Most of Kring's extraordinary people are desolate about their new ability, as it sets them apart from mankind. The heroes don't know one another, but Mohinder (Sendhil Ramamurthy ), a genetics professor from India, has just arrived in New York and will probably provide the series with cohesion. Mohinder wants to know who murdered his father, a geneticist obsessed with a "global event," and his search may pull our heroes together to form some kind of low-key "X-Men"-like force.

NPR's Top 300 Songs

The List Includes:

- "Walk This Way" Joe Perry & Steve Tyler, as performed by Run D.M.C. & Aerosmith (1986)

-"Sittin' On The Dock Of The Bay" Otis Redding & Steve Cropper (1968)

- "Night & Day" Cole Porter (1932)

-"F*** Tha Police" N.W.A. (1989)

- "West End Blues" Clarence Williams & Joe Oliver, as performed by Louis Armstrong And His Hot Five (1928)

-"Let's Stay Together" Al Green (1971)

- West Side Story (Musical) Leonard Bernstein/Stephen Sondheim (1957)

- "What'd I Say" Ray Charles (1959)

-"I Walk The Line" Johnny Cash (1956)

- "What's Going On" Al Cleveland, Marvin Gaye, & Renauldo Benson, as performed by Marvin Gaye (1970)

- "When Doves Cry" Prince (1984)

Noticably Absent are Lil Jon, Three-Six Mafia, Britney Spears and Air Supply. I am troubled. And if you want to listen to the Top 100, click here.